Last Thursday, on the eve of Donald Trump’s inauguration as President of the U.S.A., members of the Greek Orthodox Church in America and the Greek government met Mr. Trump’s Chief-of-Staff, Reince Priebus. You can read Greek Reporter USA‘s account of the meeting here.
(Presumably) after the speeches were over the Greek Minister of Defence, Panos Kammenos, gave ‘Priebus a copy of the sword of Alexander the Great as a gift to President Trump.’
Unfortunately, the Greek Reporter report does not contain any further information about the sword than the quotation above. Its video footage of the event does not show it, either. Not that this really matters. Alexander did not have a special sword. Not in the same way, for example, he had a special shield - that of Achilles - or horse, in Bucephalus. The the sword Mr. Kammenos gave Mr. Priebus was probably just a generic sword of the Fourth Century B.C., one labelled as Alexander’s no doubt to appeal to Mr. Trump’s ego.
On that point, it would be very tempting to bemoan the fact that Alexander the Great is being used to foster relations between Greece and one of the most controversial Presidents of America in its entire history, a man whose character would seem to make him wholly unsuited to holding that great office. Well, what’s done is done, but I wonder who is being used here. Is it Alexander? Or is it the Greeks and President Trump? The sword, whose ever it is, symbolises Alexander far more than it does modern Greece or America. Its presentation, therefore, surely represents yet another - running right back to the Successors, via Rome, into the Middle Ages and up to the present - attempt to bring Alexander back to life. He remains dead, of course, but the ghost also remains on his throne.
What ties white supremacism, Alexander and Donald Trump? That will be the topic of my next post.
I don’t agree with you. Which King never had a sword!? It’s not possible for a King to not to know how to handle a sword.
LikeLike
Chamara, I’m not suggesting that Alexander never had a sword but that he did not own one to which he was attached in the same way he was his shield and horse.
LikeLike
Common..a King without a sword? How he attack the opposition? It may be not the same shape as modern swords but it’s not possible to go to a battle without a sword.
LikeLike
I’m sure he had a sword just like he had a spear. Also when fighting he can grab any spear from a soldier on the ground and I’m sure he had a sword attached.
LikeLike