Monthly Archives: October 2013

A Letter to Arrian (15) Flawed Men of Tongue, Deed and Power

roman_writerMy dear Arrian,
.
It seems to me that Callisthenes was not only a tactless man but an extremely reckless one as well. It is bad enough that he was so proud as to believe that Alexander would be made divine through his account of the expedition but for him to say that Harmodius and Aristogeiton were the people most honoured by the Athenians on account of their tyrannicide and ending of ‘irresponsible government’ was just foolish. Did Callisthenes not realise or simply not care that Alexander might feel that he was having a jab at him and take offence?
.
That aside, you record him making a very persuasive argument against the practice of proskynesis. I note that you have Callisthenes say that the erection of statues is typical of the worship of gods rather than the honouring of men. Presumably he did not approve of the erection of statues to Harmodius and Aristogeiton?
.
Whatever his view of the statues, Callisthenes was clearly a lover of tradition. This brings me neatly onto another one - the Great King’s kiss which, the man who compiled the notes to your book says, was ‘customarily’ made upon the lips. In my day, only lovers kiss each other in this fashion. Our monarch would never do this. She is a very aloof figure, although still - in her own way - much more accessible than the Great King ever was. Who would have thought that there are different ways to be aloof and accessible!
.
The reference to the Syrian woman with the gift of second sight is such an intriguing one. I wish you had said more about her. Perhaps there was no more to say? Never mind; although she appears but briefly, we learn much about Alexander’s religiosity, superstition and trust through her. There must be more to this story than you are saying or know for I still can’t believe he gave her free admittance to his bed chamber. Such a security risk!
.
Before moving on, I must say that I liked the fact that at first Alexander and his friends used to laugh at the woman. Not because I dislike her but because it is a little detail that would never be included were this story not true.
.
To Hermolaus. Alexander certainly treated him very badly when he had him whipped and deprived of his horse. And for what? Killing the boar before Alexander could! I suppose the fact that Hermolaus decided on the strength of the incident to murder Alexander shows how seriously the Macedonians took their dignity. To be fair, it was probably just the straw that broke the camel’s back (I am sorry I do not know the Roman equivalent of this saying).
.
During his trial, Hermolaus attempted to justify his actions by condemning Alexander’s excesses as king. His list of reasons is a check list for anyone who thinks Alexander was a failure, and a challenge to those who say he really was great. Where do we stand? Where do I stand? Of course, the whole Alexander has to be considered. He may indeed have committed crimes but he also did many good things. Which weigh heavier in the scales? That is the real question.
.
Your friend,
.
φιλέλλην

The above picture is from Ancient History
.
An index of all the letters can be found here

Categories: Letters to Arrian | Tags: , | Leave a comment

Tom Holland on Herodotus’ Histories

This evening I visited Daunt Books in Marylebone to listen to Tom Holland talk about his new translation of Herodotus’ Histories with the editor of History Today*.
.
I first met Herodotus in 1996 after watching The English Patient. If you haven’t seen Anthony Minghella’s masterpiece, I thoroughly recommend it to you; it is a powerful story of love, betrayal and the fluid nature of identity. Herodotus’ story of Candaules and Gyges plays a small but central part in the unfolding drama of Almásy and Katherine’s relationship.
.
Tom Holland’s engagement with Herodotus began at the age of twelve. Back then he read the book to learn about the Persian Wars. As anyone who has read the Histories knows, Herodotus is not only the Father of History but the Master of Digression. Holland admitted that when he was young they made him impatient but now he regards them differently; as legitimate, I suppose, a part of the book as the ‘gripping’ accounts of the Persian Wars themselves.
.
The Histories is not, technically speaking, a history. The Greek word, historia, from which we derive ‘history’, meant ‘enquiry’ or ‘research’ to Herodotus. Historia did not come to mean ‘history’ for another hundred years (Holland referred to the ‘Alexandrian era’). The title, though, is well chosen as Herodotus was perennially interested in everything around him. Thus, the book contains history, ethnography, information about cultural customs, religious practices, and so forth. Holland made the entertaining point that when we use Google we are following in Herodotus’ inquisitive footsteps. Imagine if Herodotus had had Google; I imagine he would have been stuck to his laptop!

20131002-230729.jpg

Alexander to Herodotus (note the scratch on the cover. The book should have had a dust jacket!)

Holland told us that Herodotus was an ‘utterly charming’ writer; he was the kind of man you would want at a dinner party. But Herodotus’ was not an empty charm; he was also a very sympathetic man. This is seen in the respect he gives to the Persians who were, after all, the Greeks’ enemy. I think Holland said that Herodotus admires them. That really is the mark of a truly civilised man. I wonder if our modern day equivalent would be to respect and admire countries and religions to whom we are opposed or do not believe in.
.
Holland said that it took him five years to translate the Histories. While working on it, he followed the practice of translating one paragraph a day. Of course, some of the paragraphs are very short - a sentence long - while others are equally long - being pages in length. Holland’s practice here was not to ‘bank’ his sentence and then go and do something else but carry on so that he wouldn’t fall behind his schedule whenever he came to a long paragraph. I wonder how Herodotus wrote?
.
One thing that came across very strongly tonight was Holland’s love for Herodotus. I suspect he really was sad when he finished translating the book.
.
During the Q and A session, a man asked if we could also call Herodotus the Father of Journalism. The man said he hoped so as he was a teacher in that subject and taught his students to follow Herodotus’ practice of declaring the source of his information when writing stories; for example, by writing ‘this is what I was told [by]…’, ‘I got the story this way’ so that, I guess, people knew with what caution to approach it. Holland agreed that there is a sense in which Herodotus is a journalist.
.
Finally, I must mention that Holland suggested that Herodotus gives us the earliest joke that we can still genuinely smile at. He was referring to the story of the small pyramids at Giza. Herodotus says the Egyptian priests told him they were built by a pharaonic princess who paid for them by prostituting herself. Well, she was a princess so was able to charge a lot of money! In case you are wondering we know for a fact that that is not how they were built - as if a princess would ever prostitute herself (or indeed make enough money to pay for pyramids of any size).
.
After the Q & A finished, those of us with books queued to have them signed. I have already started reading my copy and am enjoying it a lot. The only disappointment I have with it, is its physical appearance. It is a thick book (833 pages) but came with no book mark. Also, the spine and front cover have - within days - started to become worn. The book was not sold with a dust jacket, which surprised me. I suppose this was to keep the price down but am still disappointed.
.
After the event concluded, I stepped out into street filled with the kind of satisfaction that only a glass of nice red wine, an hour with a friendly author, good convo and questions, and the knowledge that I am lucky enough to have his translation of Herodotus to read, can give. Take that Croesus.
.
* You can hear Tom Holland talk about his translation in a podcast at the History Today website here

Categories: Of The Moment | Tags: | 3 Comments

The Battle of Gaugamela

Calculating the date on which ancient events happened is a fraught business, and one that is prone to error. I can live with that, especially if the event is the Battle of Gaugamela, which is said to have been fought on this day in 331 BC.
.
Stop what you are doing, get a glass of wine and toast to Alexander’s triumph, the spread of Hellenism, the fall of the Persian Empire, the end of the Archaemenid dynasty, and feel free to shed tears because you weren’t alive to see it all happen.

20131001-125232.jpg

“In this struggle, Alexander was once again victorious.”
(Arrian)

Categories: On Alexander | Tags: , , | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Customized Adventure Journal Theme.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers