I started writing this blog, I think, in 2011. Back then, I was still getting to know the main sources for Alexander the Great’s life: Arrian, Curtius, Diodorus, Justin, and Plutarch. I don’t know what the percentage is, but in my memory, I feel that a lot of the posts I wrote then were connected to my reading of them. That was great as the writing allowed me to soak up what I had read better than if I had just read and then put the book away.
However, there came a moment when I realised that I had now read the sources once or maybe twice in a row, all the time writing about them as I did so, and, as a result, it was now time to move on, to find other things to write about Alexander. But what? I never could quite figure it out.
Ever since I ‘discovered’ the great conqueror, I had been happy for my reading and writing to be at the level of a ‘private passion’. Looking back at the last four or five years, though, as the blog slowly ground to a halt because I didn’t know what to say, I wish that I had, after all, signed up to a course to study him in a more formal setting. That would surely have given me ideas. Well, there’s no use crying over spilt milk. I never did sign up to anything, and that’s that.
As a result of my indecision, the blog finally came to a proper halt last August. Perhaps I should have deleted it. Not that I knew last summer that it would be six months before I wrote another post. The problem, though, is that I remain passionate about Alexander. I know this because, even though my blogging, and, I must admit, my reading, had pretty much stopped, I remained very happy - in real life - to talk people’s socks off about him given half the chance.
I always felt a bit guilty, though, because I knew I was using old knowledge. I wasn’t keeping myself fresh through (re)reading books or watching videos on YouTube, listening to podcasts, etc.
That aside, passion is why I am writing this post now.
Passion is a funny thing. I wrote my last post in August ’22 but for most of the time since - even though I haven’t known what to write - I’ve wanted to write. I’ve thought of ideas but none have stuck long enough for me to set them down on the screen, and then press publish.
What has changed? ‘Passion’ aside, why am I writing this post now? Well, it isn’t because I have had a revelation and now am full of ideas. I think it really is just that passion driving me to write something/anything. Maybe it will lead to renewed posting, maybe not. We’ll see.
I say I’m not full of ideas. I did have one. I am writing this post on 19th March 2023. It is Mothering Sunday today in the UK. A very happy Mothers’ Day to you if you are a mother of any description. I heard Mass at my local parish church this morning, and while there, I got distracted - it usually happens - and it occurred to me that I could write something about Olympias, Alexander’s mother.
Ideally, I would have liked to have researched her a little first, but because the desire to write and, I guess, explain my blog absence, was stronger, here I am now. So, I will just say this: Olympias was a very driven person. She was probably not a tremendously likeable one. She undoubtedly (in my mind), though, gets a very bad rap from the sources. Maybe she was as vile as they make out, but I suspect they just didn’t like a strong woman who knew what needed to be done and got on with it, even if to the nth degree. Even today, we as a society still aren’t overly keen on women who speak up, who are strong: and we live in a supposedly more accepting world. No wonder Olympias gets both barrels from the far more mysoginistic world in which she lived, and which came after in the form of the Roman empire.
That aside, Olympias may still have been a nasty piece of work, but one anecdote about her speaks very loudly to me in this regard. It comes from Plutarch’s Life of Alexander (Chapter 3). There, he talks about how, according to an author named Eratosthenes, when Alexander set out,
… on his eastern campaign, Olympias accompanied him during the procession [and] told him in private the secret of his birth…
i.e. that he was not Philip’s son but the son of Zeus-Ammon. However, according to other sources, Olympias,
… repudiated the idea [that Alexander was Zeus-Ammon’s son] on religious grounds, and said, ‘I wish Alexander would stop getting me into trouble with Hera.’
Even if at the expense of Alexander’s ego, I hope that this anecdote is true. It would give us a glimpse of a woman who was devout and had a good sense of proportion, of someone who was not totally hell bent on her and her son’s success. Maybe I’m clutching at straws but it’s better than nothing.
Well, there we are. I’m back. I hope to write another post next Sunday when I get home from Mass. It would be wonderful if I could make late morning - early afternoons on Sundays my Alexander writing time. Before I finish, though, I will mention this: a few days ago I started reading again. I picked up my copy of Alexander the Great: Myth, Genesis and Sexuality by Daniel Ogden. I read the introduction and a couple of pages of Chapter One. Let’s challenge myself to make good progress in the week ahead so that, even if I have nothing else to say, I can talk about the book!
Credits
Plutarch Hellenistic Lives including Alexander the Great (tr. Robin Waterfield) (OUP 2016)
Olympias, Roman Medallion Wikipedia
Angelina Jolie as Olympias - Reddit
I may not write anymore myself, but my love of all things Alexander is still there. Looking forward to reading new entries here.
LikeLike
Hi Terri, it’s good to see you here! I hope you are doing well.
LikeLike
Welcome back!
Loved the Olympias anecdote. New to me - thank you! Can you remember where you read it? (Which source it was from.)
I’d like to think she had sense of humour too. Seems in a similar vein as Alexander’s quip that Olympias charged him high rent for nine months lodging.
Not sure if there is any evidence of Philip having had a sense of humour?
Looking forward to more of your reflections.
Roz
>
LikeLike
Hi Roz, thank you for your comment. Yes, you can find the anecdote in Plutarch’s Life of Alexander, Chapter 3. I hadn’t actually thought of Olympias’ comment as an example of her sense of humour, but you are quite right. I can’t immediately think of examples of Philip’s sense of humour but I’d be very surprised if he didn’t have one. Macedonian kings were (had to be) pretty earthy people!
LikeLike
Thank you for the email. It was a pleasant surprise. I’m glad you’re writing again. It probably is best toexamine Alexander through another person and Olympius is a good choice. Philip, his father? Maybe?is another way to understand him. Perhaps that could be a topic for a Father’s Day-themed post. Keep up the inspiring work.
LikeLike
Hallo Angela - thank you for your comment, and that idea. It is a good one.
LikeLike
I’ve been down Alexander’s rabbit hole for months. Never a dull moment. He’s atypical Leo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol! I must look up what Leos are about. I only know a little about my own star sign (Scorpio).
LikeLike
I’m into Tarot cards and their meanings and I made a note about the King of Wands one day. Here’swhat it said: “Card traditionally represents the energy of a dynamic king and the conquering hero.He’s a charismatic leader, entrepreneurial and ambitious, always creating new adventures. He’s nota homebody and doesn’t want to be left behind to take care of the ‘homefront’. (Poor Antipater). He’s bored with the predictable and is restless. He’s the crusader to take on a big enterprise and would rather lead than follow.It could be said that he has a rather big ego’ as evidenced by his pleasure at flattery and praise. He’s a bit of a performer and he overachieves in times when it will be well-witnessed. In private he wants tobe served and adored like the lion of the pride. (Leo). He is a benevolent ruler; he makes life wonderful for those he loves and just the opposite for those he doesn’t. (Fits Alexander to a ‘T’). Whoever came up with that Tarot must have had Alexander in mind! Until next time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The name Alexander means “protector of man”. That would be an ambiguous description of him,wouldn’t it? The man is full of ambiguities!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This quip is accredited to Philip: when asked how he would like his hair cut, he replied, “In silence.”
LikeLike